Formulary Chapter 13: Skin - Full Chapter
|
Notes: |
Specials Recommended by the British Association of Dermatologists for Skin Disease
Most prescribing uses licensed medicines whose safety and efficacy are assured. For many common dermatological diseases including psoriasis and eczema, the range of licensed medicines is limited. As a result, Dermatology prescribing may rely significantly on unlicensed creams and ointments (known as ‘Specials’) containing tars, dithranol, salicylic acid, steroids and other active constituents in a range of concentrations and bases. This is of particular concern in primary care where lack of effective price controls and a mechanism to ensure independent scrutiny of product quality has increased costs and concern about standards. To address these concerns, and help optimise quality of care, adherence to the revised British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) list of preferred Specials (2018) is encouraged. |
|
Details... |
13.02 |
Emollient and barrier preparations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.02 |
Soap substitute |
|
|
13.02.01 |
Emollients |
|
|
Aproderm® Colloidal Oat Cream
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Aproderm® cream
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Aproderm® ointment
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Aquamax®
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Cetraben® (Cream and ointment)
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Emollin® spray
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Emulsifying Ointment BP
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Epimax ® Isomol Gel
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Epimax ® Oatmeal cream
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Epimax®
|
Formulary
|
|
MHRA Drug Safety Update: Epimax Ointment and Epimax Paraffin-Free Ointment: reports of ocular surface toxicity and ocular chemical injury
|
Hydromol® cream
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Hydromol® Intensive
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Hydromol® ointment
|
Formulary
|
- This product is also known locally as ‘Emulsifying Ointment RVI
Formula’. It is softer than emulsifying ointment BP. Epaderm ointment is made to the same formula, but is more expensive.
|
|
Liquid and White Soft Paraffin Ointment (50:50)
|
Formulary
|
|
|
QV® cream
|
Formulary
|
|
|
QV® Intensive ointment
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Zerobase®
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Zerocream®
|
Formulary
|
- Alternative to E45® Cream.
|
|
Zeroderm ® ointment
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Zerodouble® Gel
|
Formulary
|
- Alternative to Doublebase gel.
|
|
Zeroveen® cream
|
Formulary
|
|
|
White Soft Paraffin BP
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Yellow Soft Paraffin BP
|
Formulary
|
|
|
AquaGel lubricating jelly (oil-free)
|
Formulary
|
- Approved for the relief of dryness of the nose, lips and face when a patient is using oxygen via nasal prongs, CPAP masks etc
|
|
13.02.01 |
Emollients - preparations containing urea |
|
|
Balneum® Plus cream (Emollient preparation containing Urea)
|
Formulary
|
|
|
13.02.01 |
Emollients - with antimicrobials |
|
|
Dermol®
|
Formulary
|
- Lomg term use

|
|
Dermol® 500 Lotion
|
Formulary
|
- Long term use

|
|
13.02.01.01 |
Emollient bath and shower preparations |
|
|
|
Bath and shower preparations for dry and pruritic skin conditions
|
Formulary
|
|
Emollient Prescribing Guideline and Formulary North East North Cumbria
|
Hydromol® bath and shower
|
Formulary
|
- For inpatient use only as per Trust Moisture-Associated Tissue Damage (MASD) guidelines
|
|
13.02.02 |
Barrier preparations |
|
|
Barrier preparation (Cavilon®Film)
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Dimeticone (Siopel®)
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Drapolene®
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Medi Derma-Pro Foam & Spray Skin Cleanser And Skin Protectant Ointment (Medi Derma-Pro Foam & Spray Skin Cleanser®)
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Medi Derma-S barrier film (Medi Derma-S ®barrier film)
|
Formulary
|
|
|
Sorbaderm® cream
|
Formulary
|
- 2g, 28g & 92g barrier cream, 28ml pump spray, sterile 1ml no
sting barrier film foam applicator, sterile 3ml no sting barrier film foam applicator
|
|
Deegan's ointment
|
Unlicensed
|
|
|
Sucralfate cream
|
Unlicensed
|
- For limited use around gastrostomies when wound breakdown is thought to be aggravated by leakage of gastric acid.
|
|
13.02.02 |
Community |
|
|
13.02.02 |
Hospital |
|
|
.... |
Non Formulary Items |
Aqueous Cream BP

|
Non Formulary
|
|
MHRA DSU: Aqueous cream: may cause skin irritation
|
|
Key |
 |
Restricted Drug |
 |
Unlicensed |
|
Link to adult BNF
|
|
Link to children's BNF
|
|
Link to SPCs
|
|
Cytotoxic Drug |
|
Controlled Drug |
|
|
High Cost Medicine |
|
NHS England |
|
Homecare |
|
ICB |
|
Low carbon footprint |
|
Medium carbon footprint |
|
High carbon footprint |
|
Status |
Description |

|
Drugs for hospital use only. The responsibility for initiation and monitoring treatment should rest with an appropriate hospital clinician and the drug should be supplied through the hospital throughout the duration of treatment. In some very exceptional circumstances (e.g. due to distance from the hospital, storage, supply or mobility/transport problems) it may be appropriate for the GP to be asked to prescribe a Red drug. This should be negotiated on an individual patient basis and should only be done with the GP’s prior informed agreement where the roles of the GP and hospital services are clearly defined and agreed. The GP should not feel under pressure to prescribe in these circumstances. For all RED drugs automatically added to the formulary in response to a positive NICE TA: Prescribers need to ensure that local Trust new drug governance procedures and pharmacy processes are followed before any prescribing. |

|
Drugs initiated by hospital specialist, but where continuing treatment by GPs may be appropriate under a shared care arrangement. These medicines are considered suitable for primary care prescribing following specialist initiation of therapy and stabilisation, with ongoing communication between the primary care prescriber and specialist as set out in the associated shared care guideline (SCG). Shared care should be initiated by the specialist, which includes consultant, suitably trained specialist non-medical prescriber or GPwER within a secondary, tertiary, or primary care clinic.
The specialist should send the primary care prescriber a copy of the NENC Clinical Effectiveness and Governance (CEG) Subcommittee approved SCG to sign. The primary care prescriber should sign the SCG or indicate reasons why they are unable to accept the agreement and return a copy back to the specialist, as soon as possible.
SCGs are available or are being developed for most of the drugs listed as AMBER. |

|
Drugs normally recommended or initiated by a hospital specialist who is a prescriber, a GP with an extended role [GPwER], or a specialist within primary care which can be safely maintained in primary care and monitored in primary care. In some cases, a further restriction for use may be defined. The primary care prescriber must be familiar with the drug to take on prescribing responsibility or must obtain the required information from the specialist. Therefore, provision of additional information, or an information leaflet, may be appropriate in some cases to facilitate continuing treatment by primary care prescriber or provide information re stopping criteria.
These are considered suitable for primary care prescribing following specialist assessment and recommendation of therapy, with ongoing communication between the primary care prescriber and specialist, if necessary.
In some case these drugs require specialist initiation and short to medium term monitoring of efficacy or toxicity until the patient’s dose is stable. Following specialist review the patient may be transferred to primary care for ongoing prescribing. Ongoing prescribing by primary care can include, if required, additional dose titrations and assessment of efficacy, with ongoing communication between the primary care prescriber and specialist, if necessary.
If the drug requires urgent initiation, it is expected that the specialist undertakes the initial prescribing responsibility for an appropriate period of time, usually a minimum of 28 days. A GREEN+ drug can only be recommended to primary care for initiation if does not need to be initiated within 28 days. |

|
Medicines suitable for initiation, ongoing prescribing and discontinuation in all care settings, subject to appropriate communication between those responsible. |

|
UNDER REVIEW: drugs whose current formulary status or RAG status is currently under review. |

|
Drugs that have been considered by the NENC Clinical Effectiveness and Governance (CEG) Subcommittee (or other approved body) and are not approved for prescribing within the North East and North Cumbria ICS. These may also include all medicines with a “not NHS” or “DLCV” classification in the BNF, those agents as included within the NICE “Do not do” list, and those agents included with the NHS England: Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care. |
|
|
|